
RE: your satellite
Terri is a member of a huge low-carb support board. One of the other members a genuine rocket scientist who works for NASA. Terri copied and pasted some of my concerns about the satellite shoot-out and asked the rocket scientist. The response:
Shooting down the satellite won’t pose any danger to communications or anything. Almost all communications satellites are in geosynchronous orbit, meaning they stay over the same part of the earth all the time. It takes an altitude of about 22,000 miles to achieve geosynch orbit. This satellite had a failure before it could fire its rockets to get to a high orbit, so it’s coasting down in a degrading orbit around 150 miles altitude.
When they shoot it down it will degrade faster and the pieces will be down in a few weeks. A year or so ago, the Chinese shot down a satellite from about 500 miles and that debris will be in orbit for decades.
The hydrazine fuel is INCREDIBLY NASTY stuff. Sometimes I have huge qualms about being in the space biz because we use the most horrendous chemicals known to man, and launching anything releases horrible stuff into the atmosphere. We learned from Columbia that these spherical gas tanks survive re-entry almost completely intact, and can rupture at impact. The satellite has full tanks and that can do a lot of damage.
Yes, of course there could be some spy hide-the-technology game, but I don’t think there’s much downside to shooting the sucker down.
Of course, Terri is still going to be hiding under the bed tonight at 10:30 when they try to shoot the thing down (weather permitting).